An Intelligence Led Approach
Our campaign follows an intelligence-led approach engineered for measurable outcomes. Each phase builds on the previous, creating a systematic process for identifying, engaging, and influencing corporate decision-makers.
The efficacy of our campaign hinges on the quality of our research and intelligence. We employ a systematic methodology for identifying and prioritising corporate targets.
Our campaign follows an intelligence-led approach engineered for measurable outcomes. Each phase builds on the previous, creating a systematic process for identifying, engaging, and influencing corporate decision-makers.
Map critical economic sectors, pinpoint high-leverage companies, and profile procurement and investment decision-makers.
Build an expert bench across law, procurement, finance, and industry to engage with authority and credibility.
Deliver evidence-backed dossiers and targeted B2B messaging that reframe complicity as material business risk.
Track outcomes, loop intelligence back into the targeting matrix, and iterate for maximum impact.
Continuous improvement: Intelligence gathered in Phase 4 feeds back into Phase 1, creating an iterative cycle that sharpens our targeting over time.
Our theory of change is centred on the strategic stigmatisation of complicity. By researching and documenting corporate ties to Israeli operations, we transform the issue from a moral appeal into a matter of corporate governance, fiduciary duty, and material risk management.
We provide credible, well-researched information to individual companies, urging them to make independent decisions based on their own human rights policies and risk assessments.
We operate as a research and advocacy hub that engages with corporate targets on a bilateral basis; researching, producing, and disseminating intelligence to drive independent divestment decisions.
We believe in a comprehensive approach that utilises every available lever of influence.
Broad Awareness
We fully support mass mobilisation of consumers. When thousands boycott a brand, it creates reputational risk and builds the political will for change. We encourage participation in the BDS movement.
Surgical Pressure
This is where we focus. More than 80% of economic leverage exists in B2B and government contracts. These relationships are reconsidered in boardrooms based on risk assessments, legal compliance, and fiduciary duty.
Not every identified company warrants equal attention, we prioritise those companies who we have the greatest chance of making an impact, this might mean our campaign does not focus on the obvious targets but focus on important but more vulnerable companies. To do this, we employ a matrix scoring model to focus our resources on targets where pressure is most likely to yield strategic impact.
Key insight: Prioritisation is based not just on complicity, but also on vulnerability to pressure. This is why an Israeli company may be a lower campaign priority than a non-Israeli company that works with them; the latter is often more susceptible to reputational pressure, ESG concerns, and stakeholder activism.
Interactive view of all profiled companies. Hover for details, click to view profiles.
Our method assesses every target along two strategic dimensions, producing four categories (each scored out of 10):
How harmful is the target?
Formula: (Strategic Importance + Effective Complicity) / 2
How weak is the target?
Formula: (Reputational Sensitivity + Structural Flexibility) / 2
High severity + Low vulnerability
Long-term divestment pressure
High severity + High vulnerability
Headline campaigns with high ROI
Lower severity + Low vulnerability
Watch list, gather intel
Lower severity + High vulnerability
Momentum builders that fold quickly
All research must meet rigorous evidence standards. We confirm through multiple authoritative sources: SEC filings, official statements, NGO investigations (Who Profits, AFSC [American Friends Service Committee] Investigate), UN databases, and credible investigative journalism.
The landscape of corporate complicity is constantly shifting. To remain effective, our methodology is iterative—we refine our scoring based on:
We do not rely on outdated lists. When the facts change, our strategy adapts.
Our intelligence system now tracks companies across multiple dimensions to enable precise targeting:
We track corporate-Israel connections with precision, distinguishing between:
In a globalised economy, total disengagement from every company with tertiary links to Israel is technically complex and, for many, practically impossible. This reality is not a barrier to action; it is a reason for strategy.
We do not ask for impossible purity. We ask for strategic leverage.
We often hear: "How can I fight this if I still use a product from a complicit tech giant?"
Our answer is simple: We use the tools we have to dismantle the systems we oppose.
There is no contradiction in using a platform to organise against its own unethical practices. We focus on what is effective—identifying the specific levers within our industries that can force divestment where it hurts the war economy most.
Our campaign focuses on identifying the specific commercial arteries where intervention will cause the most significant economic disruption. We recognise that while we cannot stop using every service overnight, we can all use our professional and personal influence to target the specific contracts that matter most.
We are not judging your personal consumption; we are arming you with the intelligence to make your professional influence count.
Last updated: January 2026 | Methodology Version 2.2
Whether you're an employee with inside knowledge, a researcher tracking corporate ties, or a citizen who's discovered a relationship, every piece of verified intelligence helps us identify high-value targets and apply strategic pressure.